(Record of the Trial)
      
      
      Facts of the "Criminal Offense":
      
      On Oct. 21, 1999, Falun Gong practitioners Zhuang Jian from Guangzhou
      City, Chen Tuoyu from Guiyang City, Yu Yufang from Guanghan City and other
      18 practitioners were reported to the authorities to be having an
      experience sharing meeting in a practitioner's home at Xiaohan town,
      Guanghan City. Armed with batons and shields, the riot police carefully
      surrounded the practitioner's home as if facing formidable foes. Actually,
      they were just dealing with 21 barehanded ordinary people. In this way the
      Guanghan City Police were declared to have uncovered what was called
      "the first serious case of Falun Gong interstate contact in Sichuan
      province".
      
      Because the 21 practitioners who were caught talking at a friend's home
      refused to write the pledges, as requested, to break with Falun Gong, the
      Guanghan City Public Security Bureau punished the 21 practitioners
      according to the seriousness of each one's case; some were sentenced to
      15-day administrative detention and some to 30-day criminal detention. The
      site provider was sentenced to a "re-education labor campus".
      The so-called "agitators", Zhuang Jian and Chen Tuoyu, and
      "organizer", Yu Yufang, were put in unlimited criminal
      detention.
      
      
      Brief Introduction to these Dafa Practitioners:
      
      Zhuang Jian, male, 27, was a Master's degree student in Economics. He
      started to practice Falun Gong in 1997, and has been to Beijing to appeal
      for Falun Gong 3 times since last July 22. His wife also appealed for
      Falun Gong in Beijing many times. Chen Tuoyu (the author of "Over
      There", "Coming Back From Over There", and "Over There
      II"), is a male, 28, who was a lawyer. He started to practice Falun
      Gong in 1997. His wife also went to Beijing to appeal, and was forced to
      resign after she came back.
      
      Yu Yufang, female, 51, was a Communist Party Member, (forced to withdraw
      from party membership after 7/22/99). She was a former CEO of the Guanghan
      City Ice Factory. During her term of office as CEO, she was always beloved
      and respected by the workers and staff members. Her reputation as a kind
      person was known far and wide.
      
      
      A Court Verdict Decided before the Trial
      
      Probably because the authorities totally failed to transform these
      practitioners, or because these people being "transformed" went
      on a hunger strike instead of repenting their errors", or possibly
      because Luo Gan and He Zuoxiu were inspecting Guanghan, the local
      governments in Sichuan escalated the persecutions on Falun Gong
      practitioners. The Guanghan City Court eventually decided to have a
      so-called "open court" to bring to trial Zhuang Jian, Chen Tuoyu
      and Yu Yufang on July 5, 2000, despite the fact that the prosecutor had
      not collected enough evidence to support the accusation and had postponed
      the date of opening the court session several times for this reason. It
      should be noted that it has been said that Sichuan Province was an
      important place in the southwest of China to suppress Falun Gong.
      Accordingly, the geographically favored Guanghan area was chosen as a
      vital place to repress Falun Gong in Sichuan Province. This was because
      Guanghan had become the regular place for having large group practices and
      experience sharing.)
      
      On July 3, the family members of Zhuang Jian and Chen Tuoyu came to the
      Guanghan City Court and asked to defend the accused in court.
      
      Once by chance, somebody saw two confidential documents:
      
      The first one was a report submitted by Guanghan City Court to its higher
      authorities. In the report, it said that the court had already made its
      judgment to convict the practitioners of "organizing and using the
      evil cult to prevent the law from being implemented". And they were
      going to give Zhuang Jian five-years' imprisonment, Chen Tuoyu
      three-years' imprisonment and Yu Yufang three-years' imprisonment. They
      submitted it to De Yang City Intermediate People's Court and Sichuan
      Province Higher People's Court for their approvals.
      
      The second document was the written replies from the Deyang City
      Intermediate People's Court and the Sichuan Province Higher People's
      Court.. They agreed with the decision of the Guanghan City Court, but the
      measurement of penalty was adjusted to 4 years for Zhuang Jian, 3 years
      and 6 months for Chen Tuoyu, and 3 years for Yu Yufang. It was dated June
      29, 2000.
      
      Both documents were ironically stamped "Solemn" by the court.
      Guided by evil motives, the Constitution and human rights were already
      trampled underfoot by those ill-intentioned people.
      
      
      The So-Called Open Court Trial:
      
      Although the defendants were merely two young gentlemen and a kind-hearted
      elderly lady, on the day of trial the court insisted on firmly closed
      gates and tight controls on spectators. In this way they revealed their
      own guilty conscience. Large numbers of armed police, riot police, packed
      the whole street in front of the Court as if they were facing extreme
      danger. The 25 neighboring counties had organized many study sessions in
      advance so as to restrict the practitioners' mobility and prevent them
      from going to the Guanghan Court. Nevertheless, a large number of
      practitioners came to the court and waited outside for the outcome of the
      trial. The whole street was full of these kind-hearted people. Many
      practitioners volunteered to appear in the trial to give testimony on the
      defendants' behalf. They said that the Public Security Bureau had misled
      them to write many statements that disfavored the three practitioners.
      Right before the opening of the court session, a police van suddenly
      appeared, and all those who knew Zhuang Jian or Chen Tuoyu were forcibly
      arrested and put into it.
      
      
      The Fictitious Accusation:
      
      Finally, the trial began. In his opening statement the public prosecutor
      stated: The accused Yu Yufang plotted and organized illegal gatherings
      many times in Guanghan area. And the accused Zhuang Jian and Chen Tuoyu
      spread Falun Gong by means of telling stories and sharing experiences,
      causing large-scale revival of Falun Gong. After it was officially banned
      by the government on July 22, 1999, in the name of "Dafa disciple in
      Guanghan", the accused Yu Yufang repeatedly sent written material to
      the Party and government organizations, judicial and public security
      organizations ...that openly requested...the right of existence...
      
      The "evidence" of crime presented by the public prosecutor were
      mainly the words of Falun Gong practitioners, such as "Falun Gong is
      indeed good", "We are determined to practice cultivation to the
      end", "It was out of our own will to go to Beijing to
      appeal"... The court accepted the obviously inconsistent statements
      of the public prosecutor while the direct testimonial evidence introduced
      by the defense was ruled not admissible.
      
      
      The Evil Can Not Defeat The Right:
      
      In the court, Zhuang Jian, Chen Tuoyu and Yu Yufang showed their noble
      spirits. In their statements they mentioned that it was exactly out of
      their sense of absolute trust and responsibility to their country that
      they went to Beijing to appeal in spite of personal losses and gains.
      Falun Dafa has every advantage but not a single drawback, and so on.
      Although the judge arbitrarily interrupted their speeches several times,
      they showed their great kindness and tolerance. Their wives defended them
      in the court, and they argued logically and strongly on just grounds
      against the accusations of the public prosecutor. Of the nearly 200
      attendees, everyone could sense the right and wrong and on which side the
      justice lay.
      
      The closing arguments lasted for three and one-half hours. At last, the
      public prosecutor failed to prove the defendants' guilt and was unable to
      advance any further arguments. He burst into such words: "An evil
      cult is an evil cult, any activities that propagates an evil cult are
      illegal, and they should be charged with criminal offenses." The
      defendants argued: "In 1992, the Ministry of Public Security once
      sent a thank-you letter to Mr. Li Hongzhi, and thanked him for his
      volunteered Qigong consultation for a Foundation directly under the
      Ministry of Public Security of China (A Foundation awarding people who
      made contributions to the justice course). The letter expressed
      appreciation to Mr. Li Hongzhi for his outstanding curative efforts. Many
      people heard about it and that was why they began to practice Falun Gong.
      In the logic of the public prosecutor, should the leader of the Ministry
      of the Public Safety therefore be accused too?" At this point, the
      public prosecutor could not say a single word. The judge immediately
      announced recess, and after less than 3 minutes of
      "deliberation", the court reconvened. The judge took out the
      judgment prepared long time ago and pronounced the court verdict.
      
      That's the end of this open trial. You can judge who was right and who was
      wrong.
      
      
      Conclusion
      
      After the trial, Zhuang Jian, Chen Tuoyu and Yu Yufang said that actually
      it didn't matter how long they had to serve the sentences. The most
      important thing was that they gave the public an opportunity to know about
      Falun Gong. "Good and evil comes from a person's spontaneous
      thought" (Zhuan Falun). This was also what a practitioner should do
      in "helping Master in the world".
      
      Reported by practitioners in China on 7/12/00 (Translated on 7/14/00 from http://www.minghui.ca/gb/0001/Jul/13/lun_shenpan.html)