CommentMax
Sept. 16, 2002
During the Cold War years, there were those who argued that the best way to undermine Communist
regimes was to soften them up by encouraging the free flow of trade, which usually meant increasing
imports from them, but in some cases, such as Cuba, removing bans on U.S. exports.
Arrayed against them were those who believed that such measures would only strengthen the grip of
the Communists. They favored promoting the free flow of information and pressuring the Communists to
relax their restrictions on emigration and travel by their subjects. The collapse of Communism in
the U.S.S.R. and most of its European satellites ended the debate as far as those countries were
concerned.
The Communist Party remains in power in China, but with the economy freed from its totalitarian
straitjacket, economic growth has been strong and foreign trade has flourished. Under Clinton, the
U.S. broke the linking of human rights and trade, and President Bush does not seem inclined to
reinstate it.
In 1985, our exports to China and China's exports to the U.S. both totaled $3.9 billion. In 2001,
our trade deficit with China totaled $83 billion. Our imports from China had soared to $102 billion,
more than four times China's imports from us. Cheap consumer goods account for much of those
imports, but 13 percent of them consisted of advanced technology products.
This is acceptable to those who believe that the growth in commerce helps spread freedom and
encourages the development of democracy in China. Upon closer examination, however, this is far from
guaranteed. The gerontocracy that rules the Chinese Communist Party is doggedly determined not to
follow their old Soviet mentors onto the ash heap of history.
They are doing so by trying to retain tight control over the flow of information to the Chinese
people. They have made it a capital crime to transmit what they call secret or reactionary materials
via the Internet. A Chinese activist was sent to prison for downloading and printing material off
the Internet, according to the co-chairmen of the Freedom of the Press Committee. Foreign
journalists who poke into sensitive topics are deported, or worse.
Ironically, the Chinese government has learned to apply the tools of the information revolution to
choke off the free flow of information into China. They are moving all foreign television channels
to a single encrypted broadcast satellite, according to the Jamestown Institute. This simplifies
their ability to censor foreign broadcasts.
They knocked BBC's world service off the air for broadcasting information on Falun Gong that did not
comply with the Communist Party line. They use firewall tools and local Internet police to suppress
information that might 'jeopardize state security and disrupt social stability.' The Internet cops
monitor chat rooms and e-mail accounts.
Now China has blocked access to the hugely popular Google Internet search engine, because Google
doesn't weed out 'subversive material.'
Internet surfers in China can still use Sina.com, a more politically correct search engine that
Chinese censors approved. But Sina.com isn't as powerful and doesn't lead Web surfers to Falun Gong
sites that accuse President Jiang Zemin of murdering its followers.
Many Western Internet providers have taken a self-censorship pledge in order to maintain their
access to Chinese markets. The China Reform Monitor reports that Yahoo and about 120 other
information providers took the pledge and agreed to remove any links that "contain harmful
information."
It is ironic that tools like the Internet that promote freedom and democracy become instruments of
repression in the hands of the Communist Party in China. During their October summit in Washington,
perhaps President Bush will remind Jiang Zemin how much Americans value freedom of the press and how
essential that freedom is to maintaining 'mutual trust and confidence' between our two countries.
[...]
http://www.newsmax.com/commentarchive.shtml?a=2002/9/16/014150