(Clearwisdom.net)
Two Falun Gong practitioners, Mdm Ng Chye
Huay and Mdm Cheng Lu Jin, were charged with "Assembly without a Permit" and "Possession
and Distribution of VCDs without a Certificate" and six other charges in May
2004.á These
charges stem from their introducing Falun Gong and the brutal persecution
happening in China to the public on February 23, 2003 at Esplanade Park. After
nearly one year of procedures, on April 27, 2005, a Singapore court delivered
an unjust verdict against Mdm Ng and Mdm Cheng. They were ordered to pay fines
of á20,000 and 24,000 Singapore dollars
respectively. The two practitioners refused to accept the verdict, and requested
to appeal. They were then taken to Changi Women's Prison at 6:00 p.m. the same
evening, where they may be jailed for at most 24 weeks.
á
This verdict is
evidence that the Singapore government has chosen to be an accomplice of the
Chinese communist party to persecute Falun Gong practitioners, and it sets a
bad precedent in the world. Falun Gong practitioners around the world will
immediately take various means to clarify the truth, call for the Singapore
government to stop participating in the persecution, and not to be the CCP's
scapegoat prior to the collapse of the CCP.á
Regarding the
judge's verdict, Dr. Wang Yuyi of the Falun Buddha Society (Singapore)
expressed that the two practitioners refused to pay the fines because they
thought the judge's verdict was unfair. The judge unreasonably refused the
defense counsel's defense that was based on the constitution and human rights,
and also disregarded the fact that the prosecutor was unable to provide
effective evidence regarding several charges, and insisted on a harsh verdict
against the two Falun Gong practitioners. This is objectively participating in
the persecution of Falun Gong practitioners.
Cause of the case
Since Jiang Zemin
started the persecution campaign against Falun Gong on July 20, 1999, some
Falun Gong practitioners in Singapore have been spontaneously going to Esplanade
Park to do group exercises and clarify the facts about Falun Gong to tourists
and the local people. Practitioner Mr. Cai who is retired and often goes to the
park in the afternoon every day told the reporter that China's Jiang Zemin and
his faction have fabricated a lot of lies to facilitate the persecution of
Falun Gong. He saw the media seriously misleading the public, so he decided to
go there to practice the exercises and tell the Chinese people he met the facts
about Falun Gong.
Mr. Cai said,
"Both Mdm Ng and Mdm Cheng are housewives. I often saw them bringing their
children here to practice the exercises. I remember once I met a group of
Chinese police who participated in the persecution of Falun Gong. After they
had a conversation with Mdm Ng, they felt regret about their behavior before, and
expressed that they would no longer do those immoral things when they went
back."
Another Falun
Gong practitioner told the reporter that sometimes officers from the Central
Police Division Headquarters ("CPDHQ") received reports from the
public and would come to the park, and we would tell them why we practice the
exercises here and about the persecution happening in China. The police often
let us collect the display materials on the ground, and they would leave after
we finished practicing the exercises. Later, some police officers told us that
they had learned about what is happening in China and they came only as part of
their routine.
On February 23,
2003, Mdm Ng and Mdm Cheng went to Esplanade Park as usual to practice the
exercises. That day, two to three plainclothes police officers came over and took
a look at the truth clarification materials on the ground, and then ordered the
practitioners to collect all of the materials in five minutes and then leave.
Mdm Ng and Mdm Cheng clarified the facts to these officers, and hoped that they
would not do this. Forty minutes later, the head of the plainclothes officers
was very angry and lifted up the cloth on the ground where the materials were
displayed, and ordered all seven practitioners to give their IC details. He
said, "You don't have a permit, it's illegal. I'll charge you all in court!"
One
year later, in April 2004, Singapore police ordered the 7 practitioners whose
IC particulars were recorded to go to CPDHQ. Among them, 5 received warnings,
while Ng Chye Huay and Cheng Lujin were accused of 8 unfounded charges
including "Assembly without a Permit" and "Possessing and distributing uncensored
VCDs." Reportedly, the two practitioners mailed Falun Gong truth-clarifying
VCDs to the director and deputy director of the CPDHQ earlier. The main content
of the VCDs was "The Truth of the Tiananmen Self-Immolation."
áá
During
an interview with the reporter, Mdm Ng explained why she mailed the VCDs to the
police.
She
said, "We have been practicing Falun Gong and clarifying the truth in Esplanade Park for many years. After learning the
truth, people with a sense of justice often asked us how they could help us end
this inhumane atrocity in China. I mailed VCDs to the police in the hope that
the police would learn more about the persecution. However, I never expected
that the police would charge me for doing so."
Mdm
Ng said, "The persecution has lasted for 6 years, and the reason that the
persecution can continue is just because many kind-hearted people have been
deceived by the Chinese Communist Party and Jiang's regime. What I have been doing
is just to let more people hear the truth and to awaken their conscience so
that they can extend their hands to practitioners to end this atrocity. Other
practitioners in more than 60 countries are doing the same thing."
"In
the past 6 years, we have given the Singapore Police countless truth-clarifying
materials and they should know the truth already. In fact, the CPDHQ doesn't
deny this fact, and some of them even thanked us for helping them know the
truth," Huay said.
á
Practitioners
receive heavy punishment although the prosecutor could not even provide
effective evidence
Since
the beginning of the lawsuit, practitioners in Singapore and Falun Buddha
Society (Singapore) have restated their innocence to related institutions and
asked Singapore Police to withdraw the lawsuit. The Singapore Police said that
it could reduce charges against practitioners from 8 to 2 items if
practitioners pleaded guilty. Practitioners refused to do so because they
firmly believe that clarifying the truth is a good deed and didn't violate any
laws or harm any public interest. In the end, the case was brought to court.
The
practitioners' lawyer, attorney Alfred Dodwell, told the reporter, "For a
criminal lawsuit, the prosecutor is responsible to prove the charges are valid
based on collected evidence. However, I have to say that the prosecutor failed
on this very point."á
Regarding
that the prosecutor couldn't provide effective evidence, Dr. Wang gave one
example:
Singapore
Police charged Ng Chye Huay for "possessing 12 uncensored VCDs" on November 23,
2002. However, there are many loopholes in the evidence provided:
1)
Lack of FIR-first information report;
2)
Claiming there were two police officers on duty during the incident while only
one reported to the court;
3)
The receipt of confiscating VCDs only had police officer's signature without
practitioner's signature;
4)
The receipt doesn't have details of the VCDs, just said "12 FLG VCD;"
5)
The S/N number recorded in the receipt doesn't match with time, S/N number for
November 23, 2002 became 2003;
6)
As police officers couldn't provide effective evidence during the court
hearing, the Singapore police then used practitioner Ng Chye Huay's affidavit
recorded in CPDHQ on November 30, 2002 to
support their charge; however, the affidavit didn't mention the incident on
November 23, 2002 at all.
Dr.
Wang said, "The judge unreasonably turned down the defendant's attorney's plea
which was based on the Singapore Constitution and Human Rights Standards, turned
a blind eye to the fact that the prosecutor couldn't provide effective evidence
on several charges and insisted on a harsh verdict against practitioners. This
is a severe incident of persecuting Falun Gong practitioners."
Defense Counsel: Falun Gong practitioners are endowed
with constitutional rights
In closing remarks, Attorney
Dodwell pointed out that Falun Gong is being brutally persecuted in China.
Falun Gong practitioners worldwide, including practitioners in Singapore, are
working hard to clarify the truth of Falun Gong. According to Singapore's
Constitution, spreading their own belief is their basic right. They are deeply
concerned about people being persecuted in China and believe that clarification
of truth and exposure of China Communist regime's lies in Singapore would help
rescue precious lives in China. This cannot be ignored or taken lightly. We can
pretend that the persecution in China does not affect us, but it affects the
whole human race.
Attorney Dodwell stated that
the number of deaths in China was escalating and that Falun Gong practitioners
were persecuted in prisons and labor camps. Many were even tortured to death.
Therefore, the two accused persons must be considered under such context.
Attorney Dodwell said in an
interview that every Singapore citizen is endowed with freedom of speech and
freedom of belief. Except under special circumstances, the citizen's
constitutional rights should not be weakened or deprived by law enforcement
departments.
He said, "True criminals do
exist. They are those killing people in suppression of religious belief. Thus
every Falun Gong practitioner has the right to expose the atrocities of those
persecuting Falun Gong practitioners. The basic human rights cannot be
restricted by law enforcement mechanism of the country. Law should be a tool to
bring true criminals into justice."
The Judge ignores practitioners' constitutional rights
and the persecution in China
The Judge said before she
made the verdict that she could not accept the defendants' counterplea that
they were exercising their constitutional rights and freedoms of expression and
belief.
According to Falun Gong
practitioners, during the court session, when witnesses of Falun Gong
practitioners talked about the brutal persecution encountered by Falun Gong
practitioners in China, the Judge said, "The persecution is taking place in
China and it is the Chinese people's matter, therefore, we have no interest in
it. The persecution in China has nothing to do with this case."
When the prosecutor accused
practitioners of assembling without a permit, the Judge said, "It does not
matter whether there is a persecution in China, it does not matter whether the
persecution exists, and it does not matter whether what you said is the truth; those
are not important at all. You went to the Merlion to
demonstrate Falun Gong exercises and distribute VCDs and flyers. As long as you
don't have the permit to assemble, we will charge you."
Falun Gong practitioners were
shocked at the Judge's attitude and felt sad for her. They believe that the purpose of legislation is to uphold justice and safeguard goodness. That is the reason why
the law is sacred. Unfortunately in Singapore, this connotation of the law is
lost when dealing with Falun Gong issues. They asked, "On March 7, the Lianhe Zaobao published a report about
Annan's commendation and thankfulness for Singapore's active participation in
providing tsunami relief. According to the Judge's logic, does the tsunami
occurring in Indonesia have anything to do with Singapore? One cannot avoid
natural disasters, but the persecution in China is a man-made disaster. We
should help even more so because man-made disasters can be avoided."
In the process of applying for permits for activities
in Singapore, power overruled the law.
It is reported that although
Singapore's Constitution ensures its people the basic freedom of expression,
Singapore has a set of very effective mechanism to control and restrict the
free exercise of the basic rights ensured by the Constitution. Namely, related
authorities have the absolute power to arbitrarily issue or refuse to issue
permits or certificates. Whether an application is approved or not is entirely
depending on the related institutions' will.
Falun Gong practitioners in
Singapore had applied for a ápermit for
the VCDs, but no films exposing the persecution of Falun Gong in China,
including the "Truth of Tiananmen Square Self-immolation" obtained a
certificate. Only films positively introducing Falun Gong obtained
certificates.
Website of Singapore Court: http://www.supcourt.gov.sg/